Laser diode bar is cool. It produces high power laser beam in such a compact size and with high efficiency.
However its poor and asymmetric beam quality is a headache for laser engineers. A good solution of beam shaping to obtain a symmetric and collimated beam is a pressing need for many applications.
First, the original spatial properties of a typical diode laser bar (150x1 um emitter size, 500 um pitch, and 19 emitters) are:
1. On the fast axis (FA), beam quality is near-diffraction-limited: M2 ~ 1.
2. On the slow axis (SA), beam quality is much worse. I have measured M2 ~ 1100.
This extreme asymmetric beam quality results in the fact that a round and collimated beam cannot be realized simply using telescopic cylindrical lenses. Suppose beam is collimated on both axes and a round beam is formed at a certain point, divergence angle will not be the same on FA and SA because of the different M2 factor. Thus the beam size will soon become elliptical when the beam travels.
So the first step is to spatially manipulate the beam such that the beam quality is the same at both axes (symmetrizing the beam quality). There are several methods:
1. A pair of mirrors [1]. This method is relatively the easiest but requires bulky optomechanic mounts.
2. Step mirror pair [2]. The number of steps needed to equalize the beam quality is given by N = Mx/My.
3. Two groups of prisms [3].
4. Microoptics comprised of a series of microprisms, which rotates each emitter's beam by 90o[4]. Another simpler and cheaper type microoptics uses a series of tilted cylindrical lenses to rotate each beam[5]. LIMO has the commercial product available called "Beam Transformation System".
The first three methods are "non-imaging" solutions [6]. They all divide the FA collimated beam into N pieces and then recombine them in SA, so that the beam quality is equalized in the two axes (with appropriate N). The forth method is an "imaging" solution. This solution couples each emitter's output with microoptics elements which rotates the beam divergence. For advantages and disadvantages of the two types of solutions, see Ref. 6.
References:
[1] W. A. Clarkson and D. C. Hanna, "Two-mirror beam-shaping technique for high-power diode bars", Opt. Lett. 21, 375 (1996).
[2] Y. Liao, K. Du, S. Falter, J. Zhang, M. Quade, P. Loosen and R. Poprawe, "Highly efficient diode-stack, end-pumped Nd:YAG slab laser with symmetrized beam quality", Appl. Opt. 36, 5872 (1997).
[3] P. Wang, "Beam-shaping optics deliver high-power beams", Laser Focus World, December 2001.
[4] S. Yamaguchi, T. Kobayashi, Y. Saito and K. Chiba, "Collimation of emissions from a high-power multistripe laser-diode bar with multiprism array coupling and focusing to a small spot", Opt. Lett. 20, 898 (1995).
[5] V. Lissotschenko and A. Mikhailov, "Assembly and device for optical beam transformation", US patent 6471372B1 (2002).
[6] S. Bonora and P. Villoresi, "Diode laser bar beamshaping by optical path equalization", J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 9, 441 (2007).
Sunday, April 20, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment